(no subject)

posted by [identity profile] drpete.livejournal.com at 08:48pm on 14/09/2005
Ho ho ho. I like the way it makes all my "friends only" posts public. Hurray!

Bastards...
[parent entry] [link] [reply]
 

(no subject)

posted by [identity profile] ex-stevewpal562.livejournal.com at 08:57pm on 14/09/2005
I'm curious about this, as I said in my comment above. Logically there shouldn't be any way that Google could have indexed them if they were secured behind a username and password. So I'm pretty sure that my friends-only postings were indexed back when they were public. Were any of yours public at any point in the past?

If somehow Google is getting at secured postings then that's a concern.
[link] [parent] [reply]
 

(no subject)

posted by [identity profile] bibliofile.livejournal.com at 12:14am on 15/09/2005
Check out this thread over in the [livejournal.com profile] lj_nifty topic on this. It's possible that some LJ clients post things as public first and then friends-lock it as a second step. Since the Blog search is an RSS feed, it will pick up every public post.

I checked the Google site for my own locked posts and found nothing. The only client I use is Semagic for Windows.
[link] [parent] [reply]
 

(no subject)

posted by [identity profile] moral-vacuum.livejournal.com at 10:10pm on 14/09/2005
My secure (private) posts are still private. And a couple of friends-only journals I looked up seem to be OK.

But I object on principle.
[link] [parent] [reply]

January

SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
  1
1
 2
2
 3
1
 4
 
 5
 
 6
 
7
 
 8
 
 9
 
 10
 
 11
 
 12
 
 13
 
14
 
 15
 
 16
 
 17
 
 18
 
 19
 
 20
 
21
 
 22
 
 23
 
 24
 
 25
 
 26
 
 27
 
28
 
 29
 
 30
 
 31