Good to see I'm not the only one who doesn't like Perl.
When I first played with it, I thought, this is rather cool. But the further I got into it, the more I've come to the conclusion that they've made too many design decisions I disagree with.
Such as... more than one way of doing things (fine up to a point, but when you have half a dozen completely different syntaxes for the same operation, it makes it difficult for novices to know what's going on), a duct should look like a duct (meaning that different bits of the language look different, leading to wild inconsistencies), and it should be possible to write your entire program in a single illegible line (no comment required).
Amusing, but I like Perl. It's concise, efficient, dynamically-typed, has a flexible object model, supports keyword arguments, allows lambda expressions as first-class data, and provides full access to the operating system.
All features that Java (which I'm liking less and less as time goes by) lacks.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
no subject
no subject
When I first played with it, I thought, this is rather cool. But the further I got into it, the more I've come to the conclusion that they've made too many design decisions I disagree with.
Such as... more than one way of doing things (fine up to a point, but when you have half a dozen completely different syntaxes for the same operation, it makes it difficult for novices to know what's going on), a duct should look like a duct (meaning that different bits of the language look different, leading to wild inconsistencies), and it should be possible to write your entire program in a single illegible line (no comment required).
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
All features that Java (which I'm liking less and less as time goes by) lacks.
(no subject)
(no subject)