Congratulations on the repeat business, although I must confess that there were parts of your article today which I only dimly grasped....
What struck me, however, was that although the editorial matter claimed that this was a "new and expanded" On Line, it clearly constitutes the lesser, back half of a wholly new supplement, Life, which majors on material that formerly occupied only the central pages of the previous version. I wonder if this could this be signalling something about The Guardian's future coverage of matters dot-commish?
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
no subject
(no subject)
hurrah!
no subject
What struck me, however, was that although the editorial matter claimed that this was a "new and expanded" On Line, it clearly constitutes the lesser, back half of a wholly new supplement, Life, which majors on material that formerly occupied only the central pages of the previous version. I wonder if this could this be signalling something about The Guardian's future coverage of matters dot-commish?
Re:
(no subject)
no subject